Keli Goff (HuffPo) on McCain & Perez Hilton

Bumped. --Mike

I just read Keli Goff's column on The Huffington Post called "McCain's Perez Hilton Problem". While its a fine read (repudiating John McCain's statement that he doesn't support "gay adoption", defending the notion that LGBT people can provide excellent, loving homes for children), I was a little confused at why she references, specifically, Perez Hilton (who like may other people were outraged by this admission from the presumptive Republican nominee). I thought, from reading the first few lines, she was going to argue that sites like Perez Hilton ("What Would Tyler Durden Do?", "D-Listed", the 'Gawker' sites, etc.) provide a unique opportunity to foment action against regressive policies, causes & candidates among possibly apolitical youth who may have sympathy for progressive programmes. Goff didn't end up arguing that, so I will.

Goff wrote:

"On Sunday, celebrity gossip blogger Perez Hilton (real name Mario Lavandeira) selected McCain's statement on the matter as his "Quote of the Day." The quote simply reads, "I think that we've proven that both parents are important in the success of a family so, no, I don't believe in gay adoption." At last count Hilton's post garnered around 700 comments, some of which are blatantly homophobic, (which is ironic considering Lavandeira himself is openly gay, which begs the question: if you disapprove of gay people so much why are you visiting a blog run by one?). But for the most part, the comments -- many of which are too colorful to print here -- highlight a fundamental problem for John McCain as he tries to formulate a winning strategy for November: How to win an election decided by voters in the middle, while continuing to pander to voters on the right."

Goff is right is that McCain's previous (though probably overblown) image as a moderate &/or maverick, which attracted moderate Independents & conservative Democrats in the past, is a liability as he tries to sew up the conservative Republican base ... It's a catch-22, because the more he panders to the base, the more he losses the moderates, & vice versa.

But I digress.

Election coverage can be framed in many different ways, & increasingly we've seen the pop-culture-ization of this process, especially with the Obama candidacy, which has spawned a popular movement of young people who may have sat this one out, or simply not cared, if Dick Gephardt was running. (No offense to Dick; he's like number 3 on my list of potential Vice Presidents.) Barack's candidacy has inspired political youth, as well as those who have never been interested in politics before.

& The Obama Team, to an extent, gets this. On example: just look at the Michelle Obama PR-blitz after Barack became the nominee ... co-hosting "The View", making the cover of "US Weekly" ... In other words, reaching out to young women who are probably pro-choice, probably who have a gaggle of gay friends, & could be moved to vote if they feel the candidate (or, in this case, his wife) speaks to them on level other than health care policy positions, discussions of Iraq & banking reform.

The power of celebrity gossip rags, whether in print (US Weekly), on TV (TMZ on Fox) or online, like the aforementioned blogs, when they comment on the political matters, can be enormous. Celebrity gossip is an ascendant medium, drawing huge audiences of mostly young people, who tend to be, at least on social & cultural issues, more liberal. Comment on McCain saying he's against "gay adoption" & there's a good chance you may energize a liberal, though apolitical, young person who reads your blog to say, "Geez, maybe I'll vote for Obama ... This guy is straight-up creepy ..."

That's where I thought Goff was going ... I hope I adequately took you there.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Pop Culture

Indeed. The influence of pop culture can be enormous if you can politicize it in the right way. It can activate social networks that those of us in politics just don't have access to (those moms and young women with gay friends, for instance).

I feel like the deeper I get into politics - the fundraising, the infrastructure building, etc. - the more I forget this. It's a shame, because it's really my roots and how I got involved in the first place.

Great job and thanks for the reminder.

I'm curious to know what you think about the flip side of that though. In many cases (Rock the Vote/Aguilera, P. Diddy adn Vote or Die, etc.), the pop culture can overtake the "real" story behind the politics. I feel like it's the flip side of the equation and what can at times make "pop politics" for lack of a better term a double-edged sword. What are your thoughts on that?

It's a balance ...

It's not fake when Perez Hilton, while being a less-than-serious "persona", shows his outrage by feeding that soundbite to his audience to tear apart ... He is acting with a purpose - maybe not with the intent of supporting Obama's (or anyone else's) candidacy - but showing how morally bankrupt McCain is ...

You are right to point out that some people use election year hype to increase their influence/pocket-book ... Paris Hilton comes to mind in that she was involved in some sort of registration drive for Kerry in '04 & then, you know, failed to actually vote. One could say the same thing about Diddy (P. Diddy? Puff Daddy? Puffy?), though I'm not clear on what "Vote or Die" was/is all about. All in all (& take for example the successful right-wing attempt to use "Hollywood Liberal Elites" as a wedge), you're right about that double-edged sword.

I think we're moving towards an information singularity, where the lines between content sets (business news, entertainment news/gossip, sports news, etc.) are blurring - where blogs with a specific content set feel they can field information from another, or where there is no discernable content set, such as personal blogs like, well, mine ...

The trend of integration, which I'm going to try & treat this weekend is the future for information, & that includes the info that moves people to the polls ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vote Republican? I'm not rich enough, & I don't hate all that many people ...

Thanks for the bump, btw n/t

Vote Republican? I'm not rich enough, & I don't hate all that many people ...