Rachel Maddow nails it

The McCain campaign loves to focus on Barack Obama's "exotic" person, his "celebrity," or whatever you'd like to call it.

Rachel Maddow, in this segment of tonight's Road to the White House, nails Jay Carney of Time for suggesting that Obama's "unknown" to Americans. Take a look:


Let's reexamine what Rachel says:

There's a story to tell about John McCain, though, that makes him just as unknowable. The guy with nine houses. The guy with $520 shoes. The guy that dumped his first wife and married the beer heiress...

He's been on the scene for a longer time, but how many people know he has nine homes? How many people know he has $520 shoes. We don't focus on John McCain because people don't report it with the same intensity and fervor that they report every personal detail about Barack Obama and what he eats for breakfast.

Having watched Rachel this whole year, I don't think she wants to get into this back and forth discussion on a topic of so little substance.

But I think what she was getting at is valuable. The media and its punditocracy play dumb when pondering the question they so often ask: "Why is Barack Obama not winning in such a Democratic year?" How do they do this? And why are they doing this? They offer the standard "he's an unknown politician," "he doesn't have a core," or, if you're Pat Buchanan, "he's exotic." Perhaps, as Rachel suggests, the traditional media is complicit in this very uneasiness they're reporting with Obama.

Thoughts?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The real McCain

Those looking for more ammo on this, I recommend checking out Paul Waldman's and David Brock's book Free Ride: John McCain and the Media.

The Media

Unfortunately it is difficult to get full bios on these two candidates. Most people do not have the time to look up all of the facts on them. So, everyone relies on the media to tell what's most important about candidates. And of course the media seems to bring up non-issues or recent events all the time, and cover nothing about what each candidate truly brings to the table.

Also let's remember that Obama, while I don't care about race, is black. Ten years ago could you have predicted that a black man would actually be a presidential nominee? And now everyone's complaining that he's not winning by enough?

This is true

I think the race issue is definitely present.

But what I'm doing here is echoing the argument from Maddow, who points out that the traditional media, in many ways, reminds us of how different Barack is without turning any eye toward similar habits McCain might have. For many people, "different" serves as a code word, and so I think the media, whether they want to admit it or not, indirectly fuels (at the very least) this discussion on race that many times distracts from other practical issues.