Snap Thoughts on Tonight's Events

Crazy night. I got kicked out of the hall because there weren't enough seats, tried in vain to find the blogger press room and briefly ended up in the basement, peering up into the main floor through one of those big entryways the Zamboni's go through when it's hockey season. Because of all the running around I missed Clinton and Kerry, though did manage to catch a bit of Kerry's McCain the Candidate/McCain the Senator comparisons. That was pretty strong, though Kerry's delivery still gives me nightmares of 2004 . . .

I thought Duckworth had the best speech of the night (that I saw). Strong delivery, promoted the troops, tough on McCain. I wonder how her injuries played on TV . . . did they show it?

Biden was a huge disappointment. The speech seemed schizophrenic. The first 20 minutes sounded like an attempt to connect with the "white working class voters" that Obama supposedly has so many problems with. The delivery was soft, it got a little wonky at times and I was wondering - didn't we pick Biden to be the attack dog? Where were the attacks?

When he finally did start hitting McCain, it seemed rushed, too little too late, and almost like he just jumped into a different speech mid-delivery. Someone suggested that Biden was losing his voice and saved it all for the end - sounds slightly plausible, but the effect is still the same.

Obama's surprise appearance was a strong finish. It riled up a crowd dulled down by Biden's mostly soporific speech.

What did you think? How did it all look on TV? I've seen zero TV coverage, read almost no news since I've been here, and feel completely disconnected from anything that isn't in front of my face.

Tags:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Biden's speech

I watched it online on TPM and it's CSPAN's feed, and I was actually pretty moved by it. I get the schizophrenic thing; he ends his points a bit oddly (seriously Amtrak? what kind of punchline is that?). And he powers over the audience applause points, which is probably weird for a convention audience but on TV that seems better - applause breaks are annoying when you're not actually there. I think it was good he dropped the part about him overcoming a stutter. He was passionate but came off a bit uncomfortable making a speech; but that came off as more genuine and trustworthy to me.

The first part was definitely some strong stuff. His build up is really good and his clipped style worked better on the personal stories - gave it gravitas over polish which was good. On C-SPAN they kept cutting to his mother when he was talking about her and she's tearing up and mouthing "that's true, too" to someone near her after each anecdote he told about her. It was really sorta cute and touching.

I didn't have a problem with the end and I like that he hammered on Afganistan but he totally should have lost the middle 5 minutes on domestic policy; he was complete wonky there. He had such good economic/American Dream rhetoric before that he could have just gone right into foreign policy.

Anyway while I hate the "he'll connect to white working class folks" media crap, I have to say he got my working class pride going there. Stumping at union halls and such, he'll definitely make a serious impact.

Agreed

Looked really good on TV. The Amtrak thing was weird, very wonky, but it was overall really moving, and all the cutaways were to people tearing up or crying because they were so moved (including Michelle, Biden's family, etc.).

MSNBC/CNN didn't show Duckworth or Kerry... very crappy coverage, so C-SPAN is the go-to for actual speeches.