The Revolution Will Not Be Televised, But It Needs To Be

Sorry for lateness, as My Sunday Thing has slid this week into My Monday Thing and quite nearly Tuesday. Such is a life of casual brutality and 400-level classes deconstructing post-colonial literature. How about that for a pretentious opening? You’re all but required to read the rest to see if I recover.

This is also kind of a discussion piece on blogging, youth demographics, and bringing more people into the online process. For those looking for my usual content, “John McCain is old and crazy, Rudy Giuliani is a white supremacist, and the system is corrupt and must be skull fucked to death.” Neat.

Anyway, one of those things that have been eating at me has been something along these lines: this blog as a concept is supposed to serve as a rally point for youth political operatives looking to ferment serious change in their environments. It is a belief that the infrastructure being built, (democratized, low cost, and with the ability to reach mass audiences) will almost certainly lend itself to the 18-30 set that’s all but grown up anchored in the ins and outs of digital communication.

That attempt at appeal to youth, oddly enough, is completely at odds with the present system. The system, as it stands, is run for boomers.

The picture Bowers paints in his post regarding BlogAds demographic numbers is of a hyper politicized group of people in their late forties, brimming with excess wealth and massive educations just looking to crack some online political skulls. And this bears out in the reading; the content, tone, use of language, all tailors almost exclusively to a true believer, aging audience who want only to take the fight to the Rethuglicans and the Bush Crime Family and KKKarl Rove. The sense of humor is circa 1974, and I don’t mind being quoted that I can find four sharp objects sitting on the desk in front of me that I’d rather drive into my skull right now than read the daily “Cheers and Jeers” post at DailyKos.

The exception to this Boomer-run phenomenon, interestingly, is Wonkette.

Written by a 23 year old editor who’s survived longer than other, more established journalism/media personalities in Gawker Media’s brutally competitive numbers game, Wonkette pulls in a readership of between a million and a half to two million unique hits a month in non-election season months. But the most striking part? The 21 to 34 age demographic is 51%, seemingly proving that there is an audience of non-boomers out there who will read political blogs if they’re presented in a way that speaks to them.

This leads to another question, which is mainly, what’s Wonkette doing right that the mega-blogs are doing wrong? My main thoughts lead to the style and language. I once referred to their style as commenting on politics through the same lens as you would comment on Paris Hilton; emphasizing what’s ridiculous and tawdry over substantive, but never missing the underlying incredulousness of how stupid and outrageous it is. Think Don Sherwood.

Its the same formula that essentially fuels the Stewart/Colbert goliath, and makes heavyweight champs out of guys like David Cross; you can present horror and stupidity with a sense of humor, and make your point better than flogging your “IMPEACH NOW/100,539 Reasons Why DUBYA Is Worse Than Hitler!” diary at the Great Orange Satan. If anything, that kind of stridency turns people away from caring.

What I’m not doing is saying that entertainment needs to be the focus of every political blog. There’s a place for pure politics and organization, as MyDD has proved, and it doesn’t need massive traffic numbers and appeals to target demographics. Those looking for a serious rumble will find the fight, be they 16 or 80.

What I am saying is the revolution will need to be sold; any attempt to really appeal to a massive young audience, the kind that builds voting blocks using the internet, will have to engage them in a language they resonate with.

You’re thinking, “Fucking revolutionary dude, we figured that out in 2003, thanks,” but nobody is doing it. Music For America, which appealed to me immediately as the perfect venue for connecting the advocates with those who will vote but need to be talked to in a human way, has essentially withdrawn its online component. They’re still immensely important to the infrastructure of any coming youth vote and are doing great work, but the big prize of the internet audience has been left hanging.

But all of this is just me, and I’m into a full on sip and swerve, listening to TI, occasionally singing broken Jackson 5 strains to my dog. Say what you will.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

No seriously

I will figure out how to use the break tag before I turn 30.

Beautiful Struggle

What I am saying is the revolution will need to be sold; any attempt to really appeal to a massive young audience, the kind that builds voting blocks using the internet, will have to engage them in a language they resonate with. You’re thinking, “Fucking revolutionary dude, we figured that out in 2003, thanks,” but nobody is doing it.

Not at all. This is right on, though I’m not quite so pessimistic. I think that there are groups of hardcore fight the revolution activists that get this and/or are trying to do it. But they’re all local, state based orgs. For sure there is no national organization with a dynamic presence on the interweb that is putting all these pieces together.

There’s also a balance issue. I have to confess that I don’t read Wonkette (but I guess I’ll have to since you’re like the thirteen gazillionth person to tell me that I have to get over my Ana Marie Cox hatred and embrace the new Wonkette), but I can see two ways that this plays out. You have an organization that is highly political that successfully incorporates the cultural and actually speaks to people in real, human being language. Or you have an organization that is cultural and speaks all the time in normal people-speak, but also has a political component that is well-integrated and effective.

I don’t think you really ever get the 50/50 split. It always tilts one way or another. Right now I’d say all the groups I’m talking about fall into the first category. I don’t know that anyone is really doing the second (maybe Wonkette does … I’ll add it to my RSS today). MFA used to do it - or gave it the best try - but MFA is on the decline. Who knows how much longer it will be around or if anyone will pick up the pieces and put together something new that learns from MFA’s mistakes.

This is actually something I struggle with every time I write a blog post. Most of my blogs tend towards the professional essay style (unless I get a bug up my ass and rant about something). And I’d say that this is in large part because right now, MyDD is pretty much my #1 political fix. Back in 2005, Chris Bower’s blogs are what kept me going and engaged in politics when I pretty easily could have faded off into a career in journalism writing about cars and rockets and whale sonar. So he’s definitely been a model for me, and it’s different even from the stuff I was writing while at MFA.

It’s a challenge, and its one of the reasons I’m glad you agreed to blog here. You’ve definitely got that style more than the rest of us here at FM, and its something we really need because I want those folks reading Wonkette to come here and read us too.

Insert Verbose Media Thoughts Here

But they’re all local, state based orgs. For sure there is no national organization with a dynamic presence on the interweb that is putting all these pieces together.

We had one in Seattle that folded last year that I eulogized/sodomized, Better Donkey, which was what brought me into the MFA orbit to begin with. In a totally incredible parallel universe, I submitted my MFA internship paperwork in early 2004 as I had planned instead of leaving to go to school in the wilds of rural Washington, and then didn’t spend most of 2005 aimless/listless/dumb.

But I’m with you almost all the way, except maybe when it comes to the final marriage of the culture/organizing. My line of thinking is that maybe the two don’t need to be welded to together, but possibly work alongside each other; the Daily Show pisses people off about the status quo, and then (insert hypothetical voter org) snaps them up to focus them for creating change. The reason it, and the Onion, and Wonkette, and publications in the past like Spy Magazine, work is because they don’t feed ideology so much as outrage over stupidity and hypocrisy. It’s the job of the voting orgs to offer these disillusioned, pissed off young people something better. If John Stewart ended every broadcast, or James Wolcott ended every column with, “Oh, and Vote Democrat”, everythings sunk. It would be sinking to the level of that abortion of a tv show FOX does aping the Daily Show. The media should only concern itself with the facts, and leave you with the message, “think for yourself.” The next step is to have an organization that offers good policy, good candidates, and strong communications skills to bring these people into the system.

And if I’m lucky, Chug Bleach (which started as a personal time waster and gathered steam, and finally now has a semi-coherent editorial/content strategy behind it and will actually be seeking out new readers in the near future) will start heading seriously in the direction of just telling the truth in a funny/angry way, and then simply leaving a sign post toward MyDD and Future Majority for taking action. It will then come down to the activists to throat punch the party into the right direction, and create the electoral movement.

Jesus, this just kind of went on. In the future, I will embrace the language of the Netroots Revolution, and simply write, “So true! N/T” or “Impeach The Pretzeldent! N/T”. I’m still kind of in a state of numb horror that people still think the pretzle thing is funny.

Activist Throat Jabs

will start heading seriously in the direction of just telling the truth in a funny/angry way, and then simply leaving a sign post toward MyDD and Future Majority for taking action. It will then come down to the activists to throat punch the party into the right direction, and create the electoral movement.

This could work, but I’m all for mixing the cultural and political as much as possible. In large part that stems from my belief that if you don’t do that, the cultural folks never do a good job connecting to the polititcal, or if they do it tends to be towards old school, ineffective, or just plain bad organizations. If you leave it at that, most kids end up canvassing for Sierra Club through the fund for public interest research, which overworks you, burns you out on politics, and spits you back out into the cold so it can welcome in a new batch of idealistic suckers.

Mos Def

I think we can have more fun here.

I also think we all should be on TV. All the time. Seriously, have you seen what’s on TV? It’s terrible. Steward and Colbert are good, but I’m waiting waiting waiting for someone or something to break out and do high-end politics with an angle towards quality, lively presentation and real relevance. The re-invention of the TV drama should have some echo in the news/politics end of the spectrum, right? Right???

This seems like an opening. I mean, I’ve seen a lot of my friends linking to somewhat silly youtube videos that make what I could call a C+ effort at engaging the bigger picture.

I need to put my money where my mouth is, but it seems to me that there are huge Greenfield opportunities in pioneering alternative narratives in politics, especially so among Millennials, but I think with a lot of other Americans too.