Tom Brokaw: Waiting for a Millennial to Write a Book Titled 'My Generation Sucks'


UPDATE:
I'm listening to this again, and I'm thinking this might just be a horrible joke on the show gone awry, especially after finding out that very little can be taken seriously on this show in the first place.

But I certainly do not put it past someone like Brokaw to make that statement and mean it, especially given his poor analysis through most of this campaign. Which is why I posted this in the first place.
-------------------

In my youthful naivete, I once assumed Tom Brokaw was a decent journalist. I figured that since he was on NBC each night, he must know what he's talking about.

I must have been pretty dumb.

Brokaw was a guest on "Wait Wait...Don't Tell me!," a quiz show on NPR hosted by Peter Sagal. Prior to asking Brokaw trivia questions, Sagal broached the generational conversation (about seven minutes in):

Sagal: Tom Brokaw we have asked you here to play a game we’re calling “The Dorkiest Generation.” So, you’ve written a book about the World War II generation, you’ve written a new book about the generation of the sixties — the boomers. We don’t think you’re going to be writing one about kids today. They won’t even clean up their bedroom for goodness sake. But we also think that because they have been wasting their time…

Brokaw: I’m waiting for a member of this generation to write one that’s simply titled “My Generation Sucks.”

Sagal: The problem is we think these kids these days, these kids in their twenties and thirties — are they kids? I don’t know — they’re wasting their time playing collectable card games these are the games in which you buy decks of custom cards and play them against their friends. It’s like Cribbage for kids who can’t get dates.

Brokaw: Right.

These losers obviously have no clue what they're talking about.

I'm more interested, though, in Brokaw, because he's actually someone that people listen to (sorry Sagal), and he poses as an expert on generations with no apparent knowledge of any of the theory behind the subject.

Every time one of these esteemed journalists or pundits stereotypes simply because it's easy to do (this generation is too quiet, this generation won't vote, there's no such thing as the Millennial Generation, etc.), their own laziness and vanity, revealed in their criticism, immediately disqualifies them from contributing to any rational political dialogue in the future. Why? Because the thing is, it's not hard to be well-informed on the rise of the Millennial Generation, a group any serious political observer should now be taking seriously. Like Mike wrote earlier today, the 2008 youth vote narrative has been far smoother than 2004's, as many of these stories, studies, and articles seem to be written from Future Majority blog posts. All it takes is a few Google searches, and you've got a few pages chock-full of statistics right in front of you.

Of course, if Brokaw took the time to do this, he'd see we don't suck. We're the next "Greatest Generation." Unlike the individualistic Boomers (Brokaw is one), Millennials are civic in nature, confident enough to tackle big problems, and pragmatic and collaborative enough to piece together big solutions. The political dialogue will be changing because of the exhaustion with what Obama described as the dorm room fights taking place in the '60s. A new discussion is already emerging that takes back the meaning of "moral values," applying it to genocide, poverty, and climate change, as opposed to abortion, same-sex marriage, and creationism versus evolution. The results of this election, in which Millennials increased our turnout rate yet again -- the highest rate in 36 years -- demonstrate this civic responsibility and potential. Yet we suck, according to Brokaw, and we're "wasting [our] time," according to Sagal.

We're getting to a point now when it's not so easy to make a lazy assumption about young people anymore. This election, data from other studies, and simple anecdotes are beating back this "young people don't care" bit. It's just too bad that crusty journalists like Brokaw haven't caught up with the times. Perhaps Brokaw should listen to some Dylan.

(h/t to L. Russell Allen at pushback)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Does Tom even have any young

Does Tom even have any young friends? doubtful.... does he hang out with young people or does he just rely on them to fix his computer?

I'm guessing the latter.

I'm guessing the latter.

Brokaw is about to render

Brokaw is about to render himself another old curmudgeonly hack like Andy Rooney.

I just saw him on 60 Minutes

I just saw him on 60 Minutes last night.. so sad, him cooped up in his office like that.

I was encouraged he had a computer, though.

I just emailed Wait Wait

I just emailed Wait Wait Don't Tell me which you can do here:

http://www.npr.org/programs/waitwait/submit.html

I'm still searching for contact sources for Tom Brokaw

If you want to contact

If you want to contact Brokaw you are going to need to find a reliable carrier pigeon.

I think we should lobby Luke

I think we should lobby Luke Russert to do an interview with him asking why he thinks we suck and ask him tough questions like... tell me Tom, do you have a lot of young friends? Spend a lot of time with young people, talk to us... really... at all?

ha

I was thinking about what Luke Russert would think like ten minutes ago. Good idea...

Does he have contact info?

Connery has it

Connery has it