Live from the Campus Progress Student Conference (Update III)

I couldn't even last a day.

I'm at the Campus Progress National Student Conference in DC all day today. It's part of book research, but since I'm sitting around listening to speeches, I might as well blog it as well.

Lately I've been hearing a lot about how Campus Progress is building some bridges in campus activism/politics. Getting folks to work together where for decades now the movement has been fragmented between establishment groups like Young and college Democrats and issue groups like Campus Greens or the folks that are now reinventing SDS. I'll let you know how it goes.

I've got some pics on my Treo, but there's no cell reception in the main hall. I'll upload them later.

Update: Here are some pics. So far it's somewhat interesting. There are some dread-locked folks and some blue blazer folks, but by far there's more gray area between the two. Is it telling that both Nancy Pelosi and Ralph Nader got enthusiastic ovations, while folks struggled to stand up for Seymour Hersch? Maybe the real tell-tale is in the Agenda, which includes panels on corporate responsibility and Darfur alongside identity politics panels, some voting/electoral panels, and a session on Katrina with Van Jones, Congressman McGovern and M1 of Dead Prez.

I will say that the morning was mostly a wash. Lots of big names talking at the crowd. People paid attention (except the dude passed out on the table in the back), but these types of things should really be run more like workshops. RootsCamp is definitely the model that we need to be following. Getting talked at for 3 hours, even by the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Seymour Hersh and Russ Feingold is just too much a waste of time for a one day event. People here are engaged. They are the uber activists that motivate others on campus. They don't need to be motivated, and most will probably forget what Nancy Pelosi said today before they wake up tomorrow. I know I already have.

These people need to be brainstorming, networking, and sharing best practices. That's how they'll get the most out of the day. Let everyone mix with the big names during the cocktail hour at the end of the day.

Update II: So here's something interesting. I'm sitting in the "how to start an online revolution" panel. This crowd is definitely more blue blazer than the previous two panels I've sat in on. Both of those other panels were more social-justice oriented and they were packed. This panel is not well attended at all. It's in the same room as the Nader panel and there are less than 1/3 of the people here.

This needs a lot more discussion. Is it that everyone is so immersed in online media that this is uninteresting to attendees? Is this related to the fact that Millennals don't participate in politics through the progressive blogosphere as much as older generations? Or is it just the (bad) luck of the draw and folks wanted to see another panel?

Update III: This tech panel is winding down and not one person had mentioned the netroots or blogs. It's all social networking with a few tidbits about email lists and conventional websites.

Main Hall - Opening Session
Main Hall Opening Session

Corporate Accountability - Ralph Nader is Second from Left at the Front
Corporate Accountability with Nader

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

re your comments on online revolution panel

"Is it that everyone is so immersed in online media that this is uninteresting to attendees?"

exactly. we are the facebook generation. the kids in that room were the creators of the largest activist fbook groups, newest political fbook applications and constant consumers stalkers of young conservatives' fbook profiles. we don't need a panelist telling us how to invite our friends to sign an online petition.

"Is this related to the fact that Millennals don't participate in politics through the progressive blogosphere as much as older generations?"

true that young'ns aren't on mydd or dailykos or huffpo as much as your generation. not the reason why the panel discussion was dead. there were a few reasons for that. in addition to the exhausted audience (it was the third of three straight hour-and-a-half panels in a conference which afforded students few chances to walk around and do something other than hear speakers), the panel never really had any direction. you had tom mattzie, a guy who's all political agenda all the time, sitting next to ezra callahan, who refuses to mention anything even remotely political or even "social" ("we're a tech company, not social networking"), sitting next to the google gadgets girl, moderated by jamia wilson who never really took charge to lead things in a productive way.

Update III: This tech panel is winding down and not one person had mentioned the netroots or blogs. It's all social networking with a few tidbits about email lists and conventional websites.

Feedback

Thanks for the feedback.

I hear you w/r/t SocNet activism. I figured that might be the case, but wasn't really sure. And good to know about the exhaustion level (though I wonder how welll attended the other panels were in that slot). The final event of the day did also seem to have a fairly depleted attendance level.

I'd love to hear you thoughts on why the blogosphere is not populated by more of the folks involved in progressive youth organizing. I'm probably going to write about that for MyDD this weekend, and any feedback or impressions you have now would be very helpful.

It's a question I'm wrassling with lately, and has particular relevance for the growth of this site.

Your positivity astounds me.

You're actually espousing an inaccuracy. Blogs were mentioned in discussion by the panelists and there were questions asked about blogging. The focus of the discussion was about social networking because of increased questions about it. The way it was structured was so that the audience could interact with the panelists and frame the discussion. If you wanted to discuss blogs you should have taken the initiative to bring it up. Share some responsibility.

That was me

I AM the guy who asked the question about blogs. I asked it as the last question of the panel specifically because no one else had raised it.

And yes, the panel had a big focus on social networking, but that's really my point. The blogosphere is by far the bigger advancement in online progressive activism thus far, so why wasn't a blogger put on the panel?

Would you like to be referred to as a "boy"?

Why did you refer to the "google gadgets girl" without referring to her as a woman? As a progressive you should know better. She is a professional woman who you undermined in your post. If we're going to win this battle we need progressive men to realize that this isn't just about white men from a certain socio-economic and educational demographic.

PC Police

I'm sorry but we also have to cool it with all the PC Policing which makes more enemies than it does solve problems. You are picking a nit as I'm sure Zach meant no disrespect.

Additionally, pretty much everyone I know uses "girl" instead of woman. If you are not hard core into linguistics and deconstruction as a basis for your political thought, it's perfectly common slang. It's just how people talk and it only has as much baggage as you yourself bring to it.

I use "boys" and "girls" all the time and have never once gotten any shit for it.

Typical

It is not about policing, it is about holding people accountable.

Moreover...

Also, I just checked your blog to make sure I was being accurate, but it isn't suprising to discover your entitled and patriarchal approach to progressive politics. Looking at the demographic of your writers I can see your devotion to diversity and gender inequality. The very defensive tone in your last post affirms this even more.

This is a part of a larger problem in our movement that alienates so many of the people who we desperately need to organize and mobilize because white men of privilege can't win this battle alone. Think about it and respond with something defensive that lacks real introspection and reflection on your possible contribution to oppression.

Laughable

Laughable.

Aside from the three of us who originally found this site - only two of whom post on a regular basis - the only two "permanent" or "weekly" posters we've brought on have been women. You make it sound like we are exclusionary and narrow minded when nothing could be further from the truth.

The only problem is the chip on your shoulder and the unnecessary fight you are looking to pick.

Picking Battles

It's also about picking your battles. Beating up your ally for using perfectly common and acceptable colloquialisms is just dumb strategic politics. It's divisive and a waste of time.

My Generation

BTW Zach, I was born in 1978 so technically we are the same generation - Millennial.