Fox News Attacks Clinton, Misrepresents Young and College Democrats

Update: You can see video of the actual Hillary/CDA incident here. To watch the Hannity and Colmes segment, you'll have to go here and dig around a bit. The piece was called "Hillary Heckled!"
-----------------------------------------
Alexandra Acker, Executive Director of the Young Democrats writes in to note that Fox News once again failed to live up to its motto - Fair and Balanced - last night when she appeared on the Hannity and Colmes program.

I don't have video of the segment, or of the real college dem footage they mention, but here's what Alexandra writes on the YDA blog:

I was on Hannity & Colmes tonight on Fox News (I know, I know -- I'm sure many of you think I got what was coming to me by going on Fox). I knew I'd be talking about Hillary Clinton getting heckled at the College Democrats of America convention and the media frenzy around the minor foreign policy disagreements between Senator Clinton and Senator Obama.

I was happy to go on and defend our Democratic nominees for debating important issues while Republicans run to the right and pander to the base.

What I didn't know (because I didn't have a monitor in front of me while I was on live) was that the caption on the screen for the entire segment read HILLARY GETS RUDE WELCOME FROM YOUNG DEMOCRATS FOR AMERICA.

Let's start with the obvious errors. First, we're the Young Democrats OF America, not For (although we're for America, as well). Second, Hillary was speaking at the COLLEGE Democrats of America convention, not the Young Democrats.

But, most importantly, the clip they showed was misleading and that caption was misleading, too. I know what happened. I was there. Hillary was cheered by the College Democrats. The boos you hear are the College Dems booing the lone, middle-aged heckler with a handmade sign. The College Democrats did not boo Hillary Clinton!

I'm interested in this for two reasons. First, because, as I've noted before, the youth narrative is currently tied to Barack Obama's campaign. If he does well, then we get a positive narrative about the youth vote in the media. If he does poorly, then we get a negative narrative. That may just be the place we are in, but the polls don't back it up, and if we can wrangle a positive narrative out of either a Clinton or Obama victory that's a good thing. As Hillary looks more and more inevitable as the nominee, this type of story just moves us further away from that goal. Youth don't hate Hillary, in fact, many seem to support her.

Second, because I wonder if it would be a better strategy for the Young Democrats to not appear on Fox News altogether. Between the de facto cancellation of the debate cosponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus, the Nevada Democratic Party, and Fox News due to the withdrawal of the top tier candidates, to Obama's black-balling of Fox reporters, delegitimizing Fox News as a credible, balanced journalistic organization is gaining traction as a progressive media strategy. It might be good for the Young Democrats to embrace that strategy. We're clearly not going to gain any new supporters over at Fox, and our appearance on their programs is just window dressing for the propaganda that each show is rigged to spread.

If no Democrats or Progressives went on their programs, they would lose the veneer of respectability that now hides their pretty blatant partisan agenda.

It's been a busy week for Fox, as they've also taken to smearing the Daily Kos and Yearly Kos, the convention that I'm speaking at later this week. Apparently I'm a member of a hate group.

Check out more films about Fox News bias at Brave New Films.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

you are exactly right

appearing on fox gives them credibility as an honest news service that brings facts in a balanced and unbiased way.

Why does our side keep going on there? Last night at the gym it was on and an x-Clinton staffer was on talking about the "hateful" Yearly Kos convention. Seems since every major candidate is attending they promote the hate speech and anti-american propaganda that Kos puts out....

Democrats should ban together with a little sign that says Fox with a circle around it and a slash through it and say --- we do not go on here....

If they're going to do whatever it is they are going to do we don't need to be accomplices in the dumbification of the american people.

Fox News and YDA

When our former ED Jane Fleming first went on Fox News I have to tell you I was very against it. We would get huge chunks of hate mail, and often the Fox hosts would do whatever they could to make us look silly.

Jane was confident that in addition to the usual wingnuts, people on our side were watching based on positive mail she would get. This lead to Jane arguing that it was valuable for us to be on Fox News, however ridiculous they may be.

To determine this beyond anecdotal evidence I set out to track our web traffic and new chapter creation (on our webpage anyone can come, do a zip search to find a local chapter and join one OR create a new chapter if none exists) during the times Jane was on Fox.

I was not surprised to see a huge spike in traffic whenever Jane (and this remains the case with Alexandra) were on. What I was very surprised to see was the huge spike in new chapter creations and chapter joins. The most activity in this area whenever we are on Fox? High school students and chapters in areas we don't have much Democratic organizing at all. This flipped me - I was no longer against appearing on FNC.

You can speculate why this is the case ... maybe it is oppressed children of Republicans watching the news with their parents then sneaking away to show their true blue colors ... or maybe it is something different. Either way - it builds our organization and it builds our Party.

We knew it was only a matter of time before Fox tried to pull something like this on us, but accepting their invitations to appear was a calculated decision that we came to after weighing costs and benefits. Now that the Hannity people have done their best to make it look like young people were anti-Hillary at the CDA convention (despite what Alexandra actually SAID) we are going to revisit this debate, but I wanted to be clear that the question isn't: "legitimize Fox or not". The question is "build organization in new areas using Fox" or "ignore Fox". Now, the decision might be to ignore - but

I think we easily get caught in the trap of assuming that anyone who would dare watch Fox News, or anyone who has conservative leanings at some point in their life, are never going to be Democrats. I mean, how could they - OBVIOUSLY they must be total idiots. In most non-Democratic circles, this is called elitist, and I'd add that assuming our party could get NO supporters off Fox News is a hugely sweeping generalization which our little chapter/hits experiments has proven to be false.

Here is the difference as well ... YDA is not a Senate or House race. Our goal isn't to get to 50% plus 1 by maximizing our contact time with supporters and persuadables - ignoring geographic areas and individuals who are a "waste of time". No, our mission is to build a bloc of Young Democratic voters EVERYWHERE not just in places which already have a propensity to lean Democratic and not just with people who already are Democrats. This is going to require getting our hands dirty and finding ways to communicate with the giant chunk of America that doesn't believe what we do -- but almost definitely has a whole bunch of young people still making up their minds. Hopefully we can give a counterargument to the one their family and community is already giving.

We pride ourselves at YDA on comfortably stepping off college campuses realizing that not all young people are students, but we also feel the same way about working in rural and "red" areas - knowing very well that if we are able to organize a small number of Dems in those areas - the long term benefits could be profound. Appearing on Fox seems to be one way to do this for us and that makes this decision all the more involved.

Compelling argument, but . . .

Tony, you make a very compelling argument. Enough that you may have convinced me, but let me still play Devil's advocate for a second.

Your argument is narrow in the sense that you are doing a cost/benefit analysis only for YDA. Your argument is strong, but in terms of cost/benefit for the entire progressive movement it comes up short. In order to achieve the longterm goals of the Democratic Party and progressive movement, we need a media that reports the facts accurately in order to help build consensus and public will. Fox News stands in the way of that.

What I'm saying is, I'm not sure I 100% buy your premise that "Should we legitimize Fox" is the wrong question. It might be the wrong question for you and YDA in terms of your short term goals, but in the longterm, if we could cripple Fox in some way, or drive a push away from their style of journalism, isn't that a better turn of events for the country as a whole? Wouldn't those kids find other media outlets through which you could reach them? Less partisan outlets? I think you are right to try and reach those "Red State" folks, but aren't there other ways to do that?

That's sounds lofty, but for a lot of smart folks in the netroots, that is the end goal. It's also the argument behind Obama's black-balling and the Nevada DNC's abandonment of the debates with Fox News. Bloggers are fighting back against O'Reilly and winning. Fox News viewership is declining. I'm not sure that it's as far fetched as it sounds. I've talked before about the lack of coordination between the blogosphere and progressive youth movement. The progressive/Democratic movement is a many headed hydra. That's not always a good thing. Maybe this is a place to show solidarity and build bridges within the movement.

Like I said, Devil's advocate. I'm not sure which I believe, but I think the conversation is definitely one we need to have.