Rock the Vote and Young Voter Strategies Merge
The big news in the youth movement this week is that the old man of the Youth Vote - Rock the Vote - just merged with its studious younger sibling, Young Voter Strategies. Together, the two organizations will combine "the best components of YVS's research and outreach with Rock the Vote's long history of work to build political power for young adults." This is something that's been in the works for quite a while. Now that it has finally come to fruition, I'm left hoping for the best, but still asking a lot of questions.
Young Voter Strategies made a name for itself by rigorously investigating and documenting the most effective methods for reaching young voters and then promoting their findings to campaigns and the media. It's thanks in part to their work that so many Presidential campaigns now have full-time youth outreach staff that sit high up in the field department. It's due in part to their work that even down-ticket campaigns are devising youth outreach strategies and investing their resources in mobilizing young people. For the last few years, YVS has preached the value of peer to peer outreach and the importance of field work.
Yet Rock the Vote is primarily a media organization. In 1992 the organization accomplished an incredible amount by combining field work and a media campaign. 1992 was the first year the youth vote saw a significant increase since 1972. There were a lot of factors at work - an unusually competitive Presidential race (this was the year of Ross Perot) and strong work from the National Campaign for Student Voter Registration and the Student Environmental Action Coalition - but much of the success of that year can be attributed to Rock the Vote's combined media and field strategy. Since then, the field program has atrophied and media has become the primary focus of the organization. Indeed, this is the primary criticism I hear about the organization from ex-staff, youth organizers, and my peers who grew up with Rock the Vote as the only voice in the political debate that even tried to appeal to normal folks (read: non political junkies). Rather than create a culture of activism - or teach people to Live Liberally as we say around here - Rock the Vote devolved into a mechanism to sell young people a product: voting.
To be clear, this isn't at all to say that Rock the Vote hasn't had successes in recent times, or that it won't do good work in 2008. In 2004, 1.2 million people downloaded registration forms from their website. 75% of those people actually followed-through and registered, and 79% of those folks turned out at the polls. Those are good numbers. With their new online vote registration widget, they stand to make some substantial gains in online registration in 2008.
But what happens when you bring these two very different organizations together? I've spoken with some of the Rock the Vote/YVS staff and the answer is still very much up in the air. On the one hand, there is some very exciting low-hanging fruit. Rock the Vote's media campaigns - on TV, Radio, FaceBook, MySpace, etc. - will get the benefit of the rigorous research techniques of YVS. We'll start to get some real hard data on just how people use these tools and how effective they are for organizing young voters. Meanwhile YVS will get the megaphone that Rock the Vote provides. Their research will gain a broader audience, and hopefully that will translate into more resources being directed towards the youth vote and more political power for young people.
The real question, though, is this: Will YVS - which for years has preached the power and importance of peer-to-peer, field outreach - revitalize Rock the Vote's field program? That, to me, is the biggest value-added that YVS could bring to Rock the Vote. Right now, it's an open question. Rock the Vote has yet to hire a political director, or write a field plan (let alone fundraise for it). So my question to the community is this - should Rock the Vote revitalize its field program, and if so, what would that look like?
There are a number of challenges and questions inherent in concert-based organizing on a mass scale. Any proposed field operation would have to address these challenges:
- How will you recruit and organize volunteers?
- How will you distribute materials among your volunteers?
- What will be your quality control mechanisms in registering voters?
- How will you handle Artist recruitment and relations?
- At what scale will you do this? How "big" are the artists and venues?
- Tour-based model or venue-based model?
- Will your model be centralized or decentralized (and how do you execute each)?
Some combination of the following might serve as a model:
- Link up with local organizations (501c's) and help them do concert-based outreach in their locale.
- Decentralize everything (provide local folks with artist hookups, downloadable materials, etc., maybe work on a FaceBook Application to handle event calendaring and volunteer logistics)
- Partner with Air Traffic Control on artist recruitment and coordination with local groups
- Re-granting programs to bolster the work of small cultural outreach orgs in target areas (like Elementz in Cincinatti, Yo! the Movement, etc.)
- Co-opting MFA's volunteer system and re-centralize the whole process at Rock the Vote (This is the least desireable option, in my opinion, but certainly on the table).
A few months ago, I wrote a piece asking Who Will Rock the Vote in 2008? The answer may well be Rock the Vote. But if it's not, the answer may well be no one. That's important - young people self identify by their music tastes more than any other indicator - including race, ethnicity, or ideology. And peer-to-peer outreach (as YVS taught us) is the gold standard for reaching young folks.
If Rock the Vote doesn't implement a concert-based field program, we're going to miss what is likely to be the best chance in the next 5 years to truly integrate civic participation into the fabric of youth culture and the daily experience of the largest generation since the Baby Boom. Let's not pass up an opportunity to teach a generation not just about voting as an abstract "civic responsibility," but rather how to Live Liberally. If you were running Rock the Vote's field program, what would you do?
2008 Youth Vote in Context
The following charts and graphs are meant to contextualize the unique role that young voters played in the 2008 election, and their increasingly important role in a winning electoral coalition:
2008 Youth Electoral Map

2004 Youth Electoral Map

Youth Vote Partisan Advantage: 2000 - 2008

Youth Vote Historical Support: 1976 - 2008

Breaking News
Think Progress:
Minnesota Teachers Endorse ‘Respectful Learning Environment’ Policy For All StudentsMinnesota’s bullying-riddled Anoka-Hennepin School District is on the verge of approving a new “Respectful Learning Environment” curriculum that would replace the troublesome ...Think Progress:
The Great Carbon Bubble: Bill McKibben on Why the Fossil Fuel Industry Fights So Hard Against Climate ActionTo preserve a livable climate, we need to leave most remaining hydrocarbons in the ground. Guess who doesn’t like that idea? by Bill McKibben, reposted from TomDispatch If we could see the ...Think Progress:
Growing Number Of Shareholders Want To Know What Their Companies Are Spending On Political CampaignsPolitico reported today that several corporate boards are facing shareholder petitions calling for increased disclosure of political spending. Shareholders are asking the boards of AT&T, Ford, ...Political Wire:
270 to WinSpecial one day sale: a href="http://bit.ly/uiCj17"270 to Win/a for your iPad.br /img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PoliticalWire/~4/x2adIlP3YLY" height="1" width="1"/Think Progress:
Another Anti-Abortion Smart Phone: Android App ‘Iris’ Calls Abortion ‘Wrong,’ Cites The BibleHellfire and brimstone in the palm of your hand. A few months ago tech giant Apple had some explaining to do when iPhone users discovered that the voice-activated assistant Siri was giving women ...
Featured Video
Recent Blog Posts
-
Herman Cain gave his own response to the State of the Union at the National Press Club where he talked about how grateful he is with the endorsement from Stephen Colbert because he wants to keep the ...by: Sarah Burris | 0 comments
-
Just a few highlights of things that reference the Millennial Generation. Read the whole thing here "most daunting challenge can be the cost of college. At a time when Americans owe more in tuition ...by: Sarah Burris | 0 comments
-
A great new video that the Illinois Caucus on Adolescent Health youth activists created about how young people need accurate access to information about sex and health to protect ...by: Sarah Burris | 0 comments
-
On last night's Colbert Report columnist David Frum called for an economically inclusive, environmentally responsible and socially modern Republican party. He called out Tea Party activists saying ...by: Sarah Burris | 0 comments
-
If I knew how to navigate pulling FM for the day in solidarity I would... but instead all I can do is post a blog. SOPA's Scary Facts Stand up to support the internet, pledge your support, contact ...by: Sarah Burris | 0 comments
Blogroll
- Ablogistan
- Apophenia
- Bad Subjects
- Burnt Orange Report
- Campus Progress
- Campus Vote
- College Democrats
- Culture Blog
- The Daily Background
- The Daily Taylor
- Ezra Klein
- Everyday Citizen
- For Which It Stands
- Generation Next
- Got Democracy
- It’s Getting Hot in Here
- Kevin Bondelli
- Kid Oakland
- Kossacks Under 35
- Left in the West
- Liberal College Kid
- The Low Post
- Matt Ortega
- Michigan Liberal
- Michigan Youth Political Alliance
- Millennials Changing America
- Open Left
- Penn Progress
- Planting Liberally
- Policy Farm Team
- Political Teen Tidbits
- Prose Before Hos
- Pullman Progressive
- Pushback Network
- The Raw Story
- Rethinking Youth
- Rock the Vote
- Scoop 44
- Tapped
- Think Youth
- Young Democrats
- Young MO Politico
- Young People For
- Young Philly Politics
- Young-Politics
- Youth and Politics
- YouthinkLeft
- WireTap
- Wonkette
If you have a blog written by or for young progressives, and you would like to be listed, contact Mike.
Young Progressives
- 21st Century Dems
- Black Youth Vote
- The Bus Federation
- Campus Climate Challenge
- Campus Progress
- Campus Wellstone
- Center for Progressive Leadership
- College Democrats
- DNC Youth Council
- DMI Scholars
- Forward Montana
- Future 5000
- Generation Change
- Generational Alliance
- The League
- Kossacks Under 35
- Lose the Label
- Minnesota Youth Caucus
- New Era Colorado
- Oregon Bus Project
- Progressive U
- Roosevelt Institution
- Run For Office
- Students for a New American Politics
- Swing Semester
- USSA
- Washington Bus
- Young Democrats of America
- Young Elected Officials Network
- Young People For
- Young Voter PAC
Cultural Capitalizers
- All Ages Movement Project
- Billionaires for Bush
- Drinking Liberally
- Free Culture
- Head Count
- Hip Hop Summit Action Network
- Ironweed Films
- Justice Through Music
- Laughing Liberally
- Lokahi Outreach
- National Hip Hop Political Convention
- ONE Campaign
- Progressive Book Club
- Rock the Vote
- Screening Liberally
- Vera Project
- Youth Movement Records




















wwyd?
the "what would you do" question is a good one, and one that i hope Heather Smith (the woman running Rock the Vote now, formerly the E.D. of YVS) asks of the right people. some of your suggestions for a field model, mike, are interesting to me. my overarching feeling when reacting to most of these suggestions is a sense of the intensely focused and organized central staff it's going to take to run any of this well and that an organization like this can only have "decentralized" programs if there is some serious centralized staff effort to keep things running smoothly and on target with the national organization's goals.
this is difficult. it's something Music for America had the monetary resources to do in it's first year but the founding staff of MFA (myself included) didn't have the experience to execute.
local organizations are unwieldy and have a hard enough time getting their own shit done. from my experience at MFA and with the All Ages Movement Project (AMP), getting to know dozens of local cultural organizations all over the country, there is little that a national organization can do that will get local orgs to do serious voter work without the national org accompanying their expectations with budget infusions for the local org to make voter work a serious priority.
an entirely decentralized, facebook-ish, model is interesting, but one with difficult, if not impossible at this point, results measurement capabilities.
as for artist recruitment, if only a place like Air Traffic Control is used, with its particular set of artists, the youngest, hippest, most viral/inspirational kinds of artists to tastemaker communities will likely be left off the list and out of the action. and unfortunately, Rock the Vote, in its former iterations, has created a reputation of not valuing the artists they work with. the women at ATC have a great reputation and great relationships with the artists they've worked with, but those artists are not exactly who new voters are listening to. i would hope Rock the Vote, if it's going to do artist relations seriously, will hire someone like a young dan droller who has their finger on the pulse of new music and a good instinct for what's about to get big.
the regranting idea is a really good one, but those grants would need to come with serious metrics for accountability since even though orgs like Elementz have their hearts in the right place, my understanding of their voter work is that it's been extemely limited and not well measured.
and a national volunteer coordination system similar to MFA's is a nightmare, true, especially without a serious chunk of funding for good staffing.
but a place like PIRG (one of Heather Smith's former workplaces) has the infrastructure and experience to execute national, relatively decentralized programs well. one potentially big problem there is that the PIRGs have little of the cultural cache to connect peers to peers in a way that isn't selling the product of voting, as you eloquently put it, mike. one thing i've begun to think, in my jaded, post-MFA days, is that maybe this is o.k. maybe all we can do is sell voting. PIRG-style activism isn't going to be revolutionary. but do we care?
perhaps unfortunately, my personal answer is yes. i don't stop on the street or at a music festival for a PIRGer or someone from greenpeace or from the democratic party. i do stop for people who aren't wearing a standardized t-shirt, for people who look like me and like they're probably enjoying the music as much as they're working. i stop for people who look like MFA volunteers. and i'll sign their petition or become a volunteer only if they seem like i would want to hang out with them. if they "get" me and what i'm about and what i care about. if the new RTV's field program can pair in their staff and volunteers that sensibility AND the organizational priorities of PIRGers, then i think their program has the potential to be more powerful than what PIRGs and other groups like them are already doing. THEN this new RTV could have a chance to really harness the millenial generation into the kind of political powerhouse we all want it to be.
Great questions, Molly
Great comments, Molly.
I think there are two different things here, depending on how you define "local" organizations. If you deal with local "cultural" institutions, then I believe you are probably right. That strategy would have to be paired with a "regranting" strategy, some organizational oversight, and tough metrics for success. If Rock the Vote really is going to suck all the funding up in the youth market this year, it seems to stand they would have the budget to disperse funds. With YVS's expertise, they have the capability to set up oversight and measurement operations - indeed that is their whole value-added. The potential is there. The Devil will be in the details.
If you are talking about dealing with local political organizations like the Bus Project - groups that already do GOTV work - than what you are really talking about is Rock the Vote providing some basic assistance which would take a number of forms: connections to artists, a proper model for executing concert-based GOTV (including metrics), and perhaps some messaging assistance which would make the partnership worthwhile to RTV. 1 million issue cards costs what, $15k? Rock the Vote could run 4 campaigns in partnership with these groups nationwide for a drop in the bucket. The ultimate idea would be to help these groups build their own local partnerships and literally make "rocking the vote" a well-developed and broadly practiced tactic.
With regard to a decentralized model, you need to be willing to try something different, and you need to be willing to think of metrics more broadly than %voters registered and % voters turnout. Voting is one metric, and a big one for sure, but it's not the only measure of civic participation. One of the problems with Rock the Vote is that they lost a lot of their cultural cachet over the last decade. Trying something that is low-cost and experimental but which could acheive either of those ends seems worthwhile to me - whether that be a FaceBook app, or some kind of open calendering system that lets people promote music/activism opportunities or something else. If Rock the Vote really is going to be the leader in this field, then they should lead. If not, despite whatever good work they are doing (which I'm sure will be quite a bit), they are sucking up the oxygen and stifling innovation.
Yes, I do. I don't do this to figure out how to get x% of new voters to the polls. That in and of itself is not the sole measure of civic engagement. I'm in this to change the way that young people participate in American politics, and by extension, what the progressive movement looks like as those new participants age into Democratic politics and the progressive movement.
I agree.
a correction of sorts...
as e.d. at elementz in cincinnati, i wanted to clarify something from molly's post:
the regranting idea is a really good one, but those grants would need to come with serious metrics for accountability since even though orgs like Elementz have their hearts in the right place, my understanding of their voter work is that it's been extemely limited and not well measured.
i think it's true that we have our hearts in the right place, and we would definitely be interested in re-granting if it was reasonable, but i'd push back on the idea that our work has not been well measured. our main work came in 2006, when we coupled with the league of young voters education fund on the campaign for youth. it was data driven, we have metrics. what we don't have nearly enough of is access to resources so that we can truly build a base by building relationships and talking to people about what matters to them year in and year out (election or no election, and not about national races that only people in dc really care about). so that right now, in 2007, we've been working with several coalitions, and talking to several partner organizations locally, about how to find the resources and do campaign work this fall - to build upon what we did last year. but it has been extremely hard to find money. but what we won't do is work that lacks a high standard of proven effectiveness that can be tracked, because we want to be taken seriously.
our work has indeed been limited, but only because we do understand the national landscape. we do understand where resources come from and go to and have about as good as an idea as anyone else as to why that takes place. there are very few "orgs like Elementz" out there that have an explicit set of goals around connecting art and culture to leadership development and community organizing/civic engagement. so, i don't want people jumping to the conclusion that we are not playing by the rules (data driven, metric "proof"). we have less of a choice than most groups. as a local org in a conservative mid-size city without a strong history of organizing, it's imperative that we can communicate a workable vision to the outside world, and it must include numbers.
on the flip side of this, it seems to me that the big orgs need to figure out some better way to measure their relationships and long term connection in communities where they bounce in and out of. most big guys are only able to connect in places like cincinnati because 1) they throw big money at advertising, and 2) they piggy back on the names and relationships that local groups have been building for a long, long time - often disregarding those local groups when they jump back to the national stage and take all the credit for turning out people in places they'll probably not return to for 2 to 4 years. if we indeed are trying to build something bigger, that is truly progressive, and actually transformative beyond reformism, doing the hard work of developing deep relationships at the local level, including developing talent and leadership at the local level that will stay local, will be key.
most of what i read in this piece - which is very interesting to me, btw - and in molly's response - which i think is well thought out and direct - seems far away to me though. the conversation - not just in this piece, but overall - is so challenging because people like us want to think big, big, big. but i feel like i can count on my hand the number of places where the relationships will be deep enough. deep enough to not only swing somewhere 51/49 to a moderate democrat, but to build a base of progressive voters that will elect someone willing to truly stand up to the status quo. deep enough to develop a leader from a 17 year old canvasser to a 30 year old candidate with a legit shot at winning. deep enough to build coalitions strong enough to win decisively and see policy changes that mean something to real people in real places.
in cincinnati, we're talking about 10 and 15 year plans, and waiting for the right opportunities. nationally, i see organizations that are jumping at chances just to stay alive - and they often don't even know why.
i'm reminded of the lyric "it's a crazy mixed up world, it's a dog eat dog world" from snoop dogg for some reason. i guess because it's basically true.
much respect to all doing the work. i'm hopeful we can chart the right course.
Deep Relationship
Gavin,
Thanks for the response. We've never spoken but I've heard nothing but great things about your work, and I hope we do get to meet up at some point during this cycle.
I feel you w/r/t national orgs hijacking relationships and donor support. When we started MFA, I talked to a bunch of YDA and CDA types who were skeptical of us because the old Rock the Vote burned them in precisely the way you describe - parachuting in and out, not building longterm relationships, etc.
My ideas laid out here are definitely not fully formulated precisely because I would need someone like you to hep fill them out.
My hope for the new Rock the Vote Field Program - indeed, it was my hope when we started MFA - was that we could be a bridge between the national - orgs, donors, etc. - and local. That the job of field would be precisely to build those local relationships and help people like you achieve that 10-15 year vision. That's how you build a movement, anything else is just manufacturing votes - a good thing, but ultimately undirected and not a guarantee of the progressive future I hope to see. It's a long-term vision - which is difficult for funders and those caught up in the current cycle to get their heads around - but it's the only real way to create an effective progressive culture.
I also think that there are a lot more nascent "Elementz" out there in the states than you might think. As someone involved in the All Ages Movement Project, maybe Molly could shed some light on that . . .
I would love to hear from you exactly how Rock the Vote could best help someone like you grow. What's the cure for "parachute politics" and what metrics would you suggest as someone who is involved in the hyper local?