On Lowered Expectations: Do Millennials Approach Policy Differently?

My friend Ezra Klein, Millennial heath wonk wunderkind, takes a shot at the question, "What will happen with health reform?"

He sets up the answer as an analogy to the jobs recovery bill and concludes:

The result will probably be a historic win when compared to the status quo, but I doubt it's going to feel like that for supporters of the initiative.

There is no small irony here. A major progressive thought-leader on healthcare reform is saying that he thinks we'll secure a major victory but that many progressives will not embrace it.

Reading Ezra this morning (whose sentiments I think are spot-on), I remembered another recent conversation I had with another Millennial leader whose work is mostly outside the youth-engagement community. He understood the frustrations of his many Boomer and Xer compatriots upset at the Obama Administration over some footdragging, but thought that his older friends didn't really "get it." The Obama Administration got handed one of the biggest piles of shit in history and are cleaning it up as quickly as they can and lots of different things: global warming, getting out of Iraq, equal rights, voting reform, etc., have taken a temporary backburner while we try to fix the economy and get our healthcare system sorted out. We're still in Year One of an Administration and major things are happening.

This same divide is one I've witnessed with Forward Montana's grassroots healthcare work in Montana. Our efforts come under fire by many of our traditional advocacy allies because we aren't demanding single-payer, but we repeatedly go back to the 18-30 year-olds who comprise our base and ask what they care about and single-payer has yet to come up in one of those conversations. Support for Max Baucus's white paper actually runs pretty high among our crowd.

Now, I should say that I'm not sure who is right: the older activists or my Millennial peers. But these different viewpoints highlight something else we've all long suspected about our younger activists rising through the ranks -- we are far more comfortable with working within institutions and accepting the defenses of elites than our predecessors in the activist world.

There are, of course, exceptions. Young activists don't just mimic Jane Fleming Kleeb, we also have David Sirota in our ranks. And it is also possible that this divide simply mirrors long-running divides between the young who would go into elected office and the young who are better situated to raining criticism down on the powers that be. To some extent, of course, we need both.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Right On

I've noticed this for a little while now and tried to touch on it last weekend(not as clearly as you did here, though).

Millennials are pragmatic, and I think more disposed to being masters of policy, taking time to craft something that is going to work well.

agreed too...

I think the research backs up while Mills embrace the label Liberal or Progressive, they are also very much aware of political realities and want to see action, and at the same time are very pragmatic/balanced on how they get there--working through/with the system vs outside/against it is def something I see with Mills.

-jane fleming kleeb (in the Neb working on healthcare)

Well

I think there's definitely something to the pragmatism here. However, I also think pragmatism gets spun a lot, and there's a lot of faith-based optimism in Obama at the moment. If you look at the sausage that's getting made for health care, it's "pragmatic" from a "bi-partisan" standpoint, but so were HMOs in the early '90s, and they fucking suck.

We're going to increasingly encounter points where political "pragmatism" and actual policy-that-can-work pragmatism are at odds. What happens in these moments will be important.

Also, much as I appreciate his analysis, I also think Ezra is a skosh light on real life experience. He basically went from UCLA to a think tank to being on TV, and there's a fair amount of wonky naivate and unconscious deference to the establishment in his writing. In a non-inernet era, we'd probably be seeing him asking people to "be serious" in a few years when he finally "made it" to associate editor at whatever journal. Thankfully these days talent finds its own audience before getting all twisted up under the thumb of Palpatine Marty Perez, so that's a win.

But just sayin'. Send that kid to the Peace Corps (or hell, to Americorps and teach children from broken homes to read while living on $900 a month) for a couple years and he'd probably be twice the analyst.