Youth Vote Shifting in Iowa?

For months now, I've been reading Hillary vs. Barack as an equivalent of Dean vs. Kerry in 2004. Around this time in 2003, Dean's youth supporters (Deanie Babies, as we were called) were coming out in droves to support the governor. The things that Generation Dean accomplished in 2003, and the amount of people they were pulling into events was every bit as impressive as what Students for Barack Obama has achieved over the lat year. On the day of the caucus, however, it was all for naught. More young voters chose either John Kerry or John Edwards than they did Howard Dean.

Similarly, the Obama campaign has long had the edge among young voters in the media narrative, and even in the organizational displays his young supporters have organized. Yet Clinton has long held the lead among young voters in national and state-level polling. As we enter the final month before the Iowa Caucus, this may be changing.

Last week I mentioned a poll by Zogby that gave Obama a 40% advantage over Clinton nationally among young voters. I dismissed it as an outlier at the time, but now more new polling indicates that while a 40 point lead is still probably absurdly high, the tide may indeed be turning in favor of Obama.

Yesterday Rasmussen posted his latest Iowa Poll with the following results. Results from the previous poll, on October 17, in parens:

Clinton: 29% (40%)
Obama: 38% (23%)
Edwards: 17% (15%)

Additionally, a poll of over 2,000 students at Iowa State University gives Obama an even larger edge:

UIowa Poll

College students only make up a fraction of Iowan 18-29 who will caucus, and Obama has consistently done better among college students than among youth in general, so take the Iowa State poll with a grain of salt. And Iowa itself is notoriously hard to poll before the caucus. Still, it's hard not to see a pattern emerging. Perhaps polling is finally coming in line with the field operation that the Obama campaign has long touted it was building. Maybe young people are paying closer attention and changing their minds during a period that has seen Clinton's campaign declining in the media and in the polls. Rasmussen (where I get my non Rock the Vote polling) has yet to release an equivalent New Hampshire poll, so it's hard to say if this is still a blip, an isolated trend, or a national one. I suspect we won't really know for sure until we see the exit polling data on January 4th.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Combined first and second choices

The Iowa State U poll is even more striking if you combine first and second choices:
Obama 83%
Edwards 40%
Clinton 38%
If that doesn't speak volumes, I don't know what does.

It's also striking actually that Edwards, who has struggled with student voters, performs evenly with Clinton --- and does very well with second choice voters.

Since this is a poll of a single campus, it may say more about the strength of a local campaign staffer organizing on campus, or a charismatic student leader to the Obama SFBO, or some other specific reason, but it's still interesting.

I think I've read that Iowa State University is over 70% in state students, so they will be spread out across the state.

Second place is the first loser

Keep in mind that 2nd place only matters in Iowa if the candidate is nonviable at the particular precinct. If Obama is the second place choice of both Clinton and Edwards supporters that's useless unless Clinton or Edwards is nonviable.

The real question is: which viable candidate is the 2nd choice of nonviable candidate supporters?

Both Clinton and Edwards are polling under 15% here

Although of course, the hurdle matters for each precinct meeting, not for the whole campus --- though I wonder how many precincts ISU students fit into, it might be surprisingly small.

Predicting what would happen with the hurdle is likely pointless, since these students are likely to be scattered all over the state anyway. Still, the first and second choice numbers show huge favorables for Obama here, and I imagine the sight of a large crowd in his corner on caucus night could be persuasive...

But your question is of course really important.

More interesting tid-bits

The Republican side of the Iowa State U poll is pretty interesting too:

Although Ron Paul may be lagging in national support, he is a favorite of Iowa State Republicans, garnering top marks from 27 percent of those surveyed. Mitt Romney, however, trails him closely at 24 percent.

Iowa State University has a student body of 26,160:

73% (1,589) of the respondents reporting that they were registered to vote at the time of the survey and 58% (921) of those registered to vote indic[a]ted that they intend to participate in January 3, 2008 caucuses.

47% of students self-identified as Democrats, 31% as Republicans. And there's a hefty gender gap in party id.

Clinton also had high negatives in the sample. 23% called her an "unacceptable alternative," compared to 2% who said the same thing of Obama.

According to the poll, 80% of Iowa State U students who identified Clinton as their top choice were female, though note that the percentages were high across the board due to the gender gap in party id: 57% for Obama and 60% for Edwards. Admittedly, the sample sizes are tiny once you get this far down into the poll.

Anyway, not that I'm trying to draw huge conclusions from this poll, I mainly find it fascinating because I'm going to be volunteering for Obama campaign in an Iowa college town (Iowa City, home to the University of Iowa, an Illinois-student-heavy campus) after Christmas until the caucus.

Intending to caucus

Actually, a pretty big story in and of itself is that 58% of students in the poll say they intend to caucus --- and this in spite of the early caucus date, which many have argued would depress turnout. (Though most ISU students are in-state I think.)