Home › Blogs › Sarah Burris's blog ›

coalitions

NDN: The Changing Coalitions of 21st Century America

Yesterday, Morley Winograd and Michael D. Hais, of NDN fame, presented the findings of an online poll they conducted from June 1-7. The report, "The Changing Coalitions of 21st Century America," explores how the parties are adapting to rapidly changing demographics in America.

The data affirms what we have been noting for some time now.

While most Americans continue to favor activist government focused on promoting economic equality, those components of the electorate that identify most strongly with the Democratic Party are much more likely to want to see that approach reflected in legislation on such issues as health care, education, and off shore drilling. In addition, while both party's coalitions want action on the economy and financial reform, only major groups within the GOP coalition are strongly concerned with reducing government spending and the federal debt. These deeply felt differences are likely to be reflected in the 2010 midterm elections campaigns and on Capitol Hill in the years ahead.

Democrats retain a clear lead in both party identification and the congressional generic ballot that is virtually unchanged from the lead they held in the project's first survey conducted in February 2010. The core groups of the Democratic Party's new coalition - Millennials, African-Americans, Hispanics - remain solidly Democratic in both their partisan identifications and vote intentions, but the current lack of political intensity among these Democratic groups give Republicans an opening to make gains in 2010.

In short: the Democratic coalition has the demographic trends in their favor, but whether or not they can effectively mobilize these voters in a hostile environment is the big question.

Morley and Mike's presentation can be found here and the executive summary is here.

July 1st, 2010 8:25am
Tags:

Sign Up, Speak Up: 80 Million Strong for Quality Jobs

Last month I wrote about the launch of 80 Million Strong, a coalition of civic-minded non-profits that are concerned over the lack of a youth (un)employment narrative in the media and policy circles. With the confirmation of a youth vote 'three-peat' - newly released data confirms the youth turnout rate increased for the the third straight election cycle - 80 Million Strong for Quality Jobs is the next step in connecting young people to politics in a more active, inclusive way. This coalition seeks to make sure that youth concerns and solutions about creating jobs are heard and implemented when possible, especially considering record high youth underemployment and unemployment. Think of it as a youth congress on the topic of jobs; or the Model U.N., but you represent yourself, your story, your ideas.

More details about the direction of this new coalition have emerged as the core coalition members--S.A.V.E., Mobilize.org and Roosevelt Institution--convened it's first meeting with other allies, now official coalition partners. As of today, the coalition has enlarged to include Generation Engage, Hip Hop Caucus, Future Majority, Advocates for Youth, Concord Coalition, Young People For (YP4), United States Student Association (USSA), Declare Yourself, ServeNext.org, Voto Latino and Campus Progress. It doesn't stop there: the coalition is looking to grow, reaching out to other organizations in constituent areas where more outreach is needed to encourage folks to join 80 Million Strong and be heard. Specifically, they are interested in partnering with organizations that work with under-served youth and those who rarely use the internet (many times these are one-in-the-same).

The coalition's goal of creating quality jobs, combined with anonymous, no-credit-grabbing branding, fits into the program agendas of various youth and civic organizations, and all without forcing groups to compete over the same resources or constituents. It's all hands on deck, and the coalition is asking young people to directly participate in creating legislation from scratch. To do this, an interactive summit is planned for in Washington, DC, June 17-18. No worries if you can't afford to be in DC; the plan is to partner with UStream and CauseCast to integrate youth from all over the country--dissolving geographic barriers and uniting young Americans in a deliberative dialogue that will probably be the largest, most democratic and interactive event of its kind.

The obligatory Facebook group and Twitter account have been created (so join!), but expect videos about young people telling their story, as well as swag, art, and music all around bringing our generation together, 80 Million Strong.

April 9th, 2009 11:41pm
Tags:

Rebuilding the Economic Coalition: Millennials Unite on the Economy

The Center for American Progress recently released a report titled "Millennial Economics: It Don't Matter If You're Black or White." The report, written by Amanda Logan and David Madland, describes the Millennial Generation's view on economic policy as increasingly homogenous across racial lines.

On a range of economic issues—from support for universal health care and labor unions to assistance for the needy—minorities in the Millennial Generation are generally more progressive than whites of the same age. Young blacks and Hispanics are more likely than young whites to believe that the government can be a force for good in the economy, and that labor unions are necessary to ensure strong and sustainable economic growth, as well as support increased investments in health care, education, and other areas.

Perhaps the most unique trait of the Millennial Generation is that the gap between young minorities and young whites is shrinking. Not only are young adults today more progressive than previous generations—as a previous Center for American Progress report, “The Progressive Generation,” found—but they are more likely to hold similar views than previous generations of young adults. Young whites today are closing the progressive gap with minorities on most of the economic issues we examined—and on some issues have become more progressive.

So what?

Well one thing is obvious: as we move into the future, Millennials are in the process of solidifying their liberalism. The demographics speak to this solidification:

  • Over the past 20 years, an average of 86 percent of blacks aged 18 to 29 agreed that labor unions are necessary to protect workers, while 72 percent of young whites agreed—a
    14 percentage-point progressive gap.
  • Today the gap is just 2 percentage points. Forty-six percent of young Hispanics over the past two decades believed it is the gov- ernment’s responsibility to ensure a good job and standard of living for all, while just 35 percent of young whites did—a gap of 11 percentage points. Today, the gap is less than 6 percentage points.

Matt Zeitlin from pushback makes the relevant observation: -- white Millennials are diverging from their parents' more conservative views, while minority Millennials are maintaining the already liberal viewpoints of their parents. With a more united, progressive, and engaged Millennial generation, there's reason for Millennial activists and bloggers to be optimistic. Thanks to Matthew Yglesias, here's a chart demonstrating the Millennials' convergence on the issue of health care compared to older generations of Americans:

Furthermore, Millennials are breaking the lock Republicans have put on the political dialogue thanks to their devotion to quality of life issues. In 1968, Nixon succeeded in getting many whites to vote against their fears and not for their economic quality of life. In subsequent elections, Americans held political views that were formed along cultural fault lines; the Republican Party and its candidates seized on Nixon's example and for decades were successful in setting up sideshow after sideshow to distract Americans from their failed economic philosophy. But eventually it all catches up. And with the political awakening of the Millennials, that time is now for the GOP.

Here we have a generation focused on progress. Their pragmatic approach toward making things better undermines the GOP's effort to distract them with things like tales of people named William Ayers. A focus on the economy and quality of life issues is far more appropriate for meritocratic Millennials than the latest symbol forming a battleground for a Boomer-style ideological struggle. So now that economic issues are the name of the game, the liberal viewpoints of the Millennials have even greater weight.

Add into that the noted tolerance of Millennials on social issues, and the possibility of building a solid political coalition increases even more. The political awakening of Millennials is occurring at just the time we as a society need it.

October 11th, 2008 5:22pm
Tags:

Quick Hits - August 18th: Inside Obama and Pop Politics Galore

What I'm reading today:

August 19th, 2008 2:00pm
Tags:

Why Don't Youth Orgs Have a Seat at the Policy Table?

So here's a question that I don't have an answer to, but I think is very important. Why aren't young voters and the many youth organizations that have sprouted in the last 5 years represented at the tables of the major progressive policy coalitions?

Earlier this week, a major new progressive policy coalition announced it's launch. Health Care For American Now (HCAN) is a coalition of over 100 progressive institutions dedicated to spending over $40 million this election cycle to promote guaranteed health care for all Americans. Looking over the list of participating organizations, only one - the League of Young Voters - is an organization representing the interests of young Americans. None of the 12 members of the steering committee are committed to representing the policy interests of young people. This, despite the fact that young people are the demographic most likely to lack health insurance.

This is clearly one of the next steps that we as progressive organizers need to take. We've made great strides in moving our generation to the polls and in altering the narrative around youth engagement (though there is still much work to be done along those lines). But even as youth orgs are creating an effective infrastructure for getting out the vote and building a new leadership pipeline, we're still not a major player the realm of progressive policy. We may be more effective and coherent as a movement, but we're still relegated to the "kids table."

If you look at the recent FISA fight, youth groups are also not one of the key players. With the exception of student loans and perhaps climate change activism, I can't think of any major progressive coalition in recent years that prominently included youth organizers in its leadership (please, correct me if I'm wrong) or as a key coalition member.

It's going to be very important that we change that - particularly in '09 and '10 when we'll have our biggest change to mold more progressive policy and legislation. We're getting really good at mobilizing our members and peers to vote. It's about time we demonstrate that we can mobilize them around an issue and get our rightful seat at the table.

July 9th, 2008 1:52pm
Tags:

Building Campus Coalitions

Body: 

Why Organize a Coalition?

There are both practical and political reasons that may create a need for a coalition on your campus.

Practical Reasons to Form a Coalition

  1. Strength in numbers. It almost speaks for itself. More people working together means more voices, more helping hands, more clout.
  2. Solidarity. People often take notice when groups with very different purposes come together for a single cause. When choice groups join with LGBT groups and environmental groups and fair trade groups and Democrats, they unify their message, but they also expose individual members to different elements of the progressive community. If South Asian Students Society posts their political events on a coalition e-mail list, they’ll draw a larger crowd to that documentary screening on post-9/11 racial profiling. Whether between groups or among individuals, networking is essential, especially for the fragmented Left. If your campus does not already have a progressive network, stop wasting time and get on that now!
  3. Spreading the costs. If your group needs a deep pocket, it’s easier to spread the burden over many than to strain your own small membership. As we will discuss later, a coalition may even serve as a communal war chest.

Coalition Why’s and When’s

Political Reasons to Form a Coalition

  1. Bipartisanship. Bipartisanship (or the appearance of bipartisanship) depoliticizes an issue, draws in the moderate and apathetic crowds, and can even net funding from non-partisan sources. However, bipartisanship is rare these days. Bipartisanship or nonpartisanship may be a lofty goal, so it’s best to work toward solidarity (number 2 above) first.
  2. Safety. Think of a coalition as an umbrella: effective for both poking somebody and protecting you from the rain. A coalition can either be a nebulous entity with limited liability, or an all-for-one and- one-for-all crusader with tremendous clout, but some frustrating limitations.

When to Form a Coalition

Sometimes even a progressive network can be expanded to include apolitical groups in ad hoc coalitions. Pursue an ad hoc coalition when: 1. Large, timely, controversial issues loom (i.e., the Patriot Act). 2. Small, local, or broadly-supported issues crop up (i.e., the firing of a beloved professor, wind energy, recycling program). 3. Your group wants to host a single or series of events that require funding and participants. You can never be too early, but you can easily be too late—if you anticipate needing an ad hoc coalition at some point, set the groundwork in place immediately. Pursuing a long-term coalition should always be a goal. Try to include apolitical groups as much as possible, but always have a core progressive network to serve as your base.

Coalition Partners

Identify Common Values and Goals

This is the most basic step. Literally, make a list and circulate it around to other members of your organization, friends, fellow activists, professors - anyone who can add some perspective or thoughts to the basis for your coalition idea.

Establishing the ideas, initial priorities and goals will make it easier to recruit participants and set the stage for the first meeting.

Identify and Recruit Participants

What key individuals or organizations should be involved? Who might serve as unlikely allies?

Consider meeting individually with leaders of organizations that you are targeting to present the idea for the coalition. Most organizations have a few key individuals who you can identify as contacts. Be sensitive to the possibility of conflicts or disagreements within organizations – some may be run by one or two strong leaders, others might have committees that need more time to work and make commitments.

Since every group will have different resources, providing the groups a specific list of action items will allow them to choose what work they are interested in pursuing, as well as what tasks they feel they can effectively accomplish. This strategy can prevent partner organizations from turning you down for fear of getting in over their heads.

Think outside the box!

Local unions, graduate or professional student organizations, community groups, theater or arts groups, student government, academic programs and departments can all be sources of support.

Be Strategic When Communicating:

Coordinating information, facilitating decisions and arranging meeting times can be difficult with large groups. In order to make this as efficient as possible, collect and distribute key contact information to all of the members of the coalition. Be aware that different people have different styles of communicating: some prefer e-mail, while others prefer telephone. Do not assume someone has received a message if you have sent an e-mail or left a voicemail – call or e-mail again. Also, some important communications should be saved for telephone or face-to-face meetings, especially if there is a risk of miscommunication.

Such a list could include: hosting phone banks, posting information to their listserv or on their website, organizing letter writing campaigns, writing and distributing leaflets, publishing stories in their magazine or newsletter, tabling for a cause or to spread information, getting names for petitions, sponsoring educational programs, helping with a speaker’s bureau, signing on to group letters, and talking with or writing to influential legislators.

Establishing the ideas and initial priorities and goals will make it easier to recruit participants and set the stage for the first meeting.

Create a set of action items for each group to look at and determine which resources they can make available to the coalition

Creating a Structure

Whether your individual organization is governed by an executive board, a board of directors or some other body, coalitions need a structure. If you do not clearly organize the coalition, you can run the risk of one person taking too much authority, or the converse – nobody doing anything because they do not feel as if they have the ability to act. Consider the possibilities below when attempting to develop an operational structure.

Deciding on the internal structure of a new coalition organization can be a challenging task. Your coalition should be rigid enough to be effective, yet flexible enough to accommodate each of the coalition members. Groups will differ on priorities, strategies and tactics; those differences can produce internal conflicts. They can also provide a fertile field of good ideas, different perspectives and important resources.

Spokescouncil

The loosest coalition structure. Each organization sends representatives to report their activity, any coordination or common action is voluntary and done as individual organizations.

Collaborative

A loose collection of organizations that may coordinate their activities and develop shared materials.

Campaign

The participating organizations will work and speak together, but on a limited range of issues.

Coalition

A full-fledged coalition will have its own internal leaders, committees, working groups, issue statements and take action with the approval of its members.

Warning:

Do not cripple your organization by equating equal representation with a lack of responsibility.

Hierarchical vs. Non-Hierarchical Structure:

Many groups struggle over this question, but whichever you choose, do not use a structure that will prevent the coalition from being effective. Every coalition needs designated individuals to facilitate meetings, create agendas, serve as spokespeople, or coordinate communication amongst members.

Your coalition should make sure these essential tasks are accomplished while encouraging full participation and equal roles in decision-making.

What is consensus decision-making?

A coalition generally operates on consensus—sometimes an elusive commodity. However, solutions are more likely to be found if the coalition discusses the potential advantages and disadvantages of a particular course of action and reaches a democratic resolution. One of the main functions of a coalition is to gather and share information and help all participants gain a clearer understanding of where the issue is and where it is going.

Whether your individual organization is governed by an executive board, a board of directors, or some other body, coalitions need a structure.

[[How to Run A Meeting|Organize Your Meetings]]

Be sure to set a firm agenda before each meeting to incorporate your goals for the meeting. Have an individual or a rotating individual responsible for taking notes at the meeting, and have a way to distribute those notes to members after the meeting – this encourages accountability to the responsibilities discussed during the meeting.

Rules to Live By

Whatever you decide, remember to clearly identify several key components: What are the goals of the coalition? Who can speak or act for the coalition, and how do they get approval? How often will the coalition meet, make decisions or coordinate action?

  • Identify common values and goals
  • Identify and recruit participants
  • Create a clear coalition structure to facilitate making public statements and maintaining communication among member groups
  • Clearly defi ne and assign coalition tasks: Consider financial and other resources: what can each organization provide? What sources of revenue are there on your campus?
  • Recognize the accomplishments of your coalition members!

A GOOD RULE Create a clear coalition structure to facilitate making public statements and maintaining communication among member groups.

Sustaining the Coalition

So you’ve created a coalition and defeated your enemy. What now? There are a number of things you can do along the way to ensure that all the work you did to pull the coalition together doesn’t fall apart once the campaign is over.

  1. Determine the length of the coalition early-on. Find out what every group within the coalition is interested in:
  • Short-term or long-term involvement?

2. Install power-turnover and election procedures 3. Build working and personal relationships with coalition group leaders 4. Suggest other issues for coalition work 5. Apply for club status or offi cial recognition 6. Establish long-term goals and procedures

It may be the case that some groups will want to continue working within the coalition on other issues-this may be largely dependent on the basis for your working relationship in the first place. If sustainability is a concern for you, focus on the participants who share common values or goals at their core. You may have differences around specific issues, but if forwarding the progressive movement is something you share, then there is a reason for the coalition to exist.

Case Study: Florida State University

FORCE: Fighting for Our Rights Concerning Education

Objective: To increase student participation in civic/political action and pressure the state legislature to reverse its recent pattern of cutting the University budget and raising tuition.

Targets: The state legislature, the governor and students (in terms of engagement) Strategy: Present organizations with a simple and unifying issue to use the power built by the many different groups working together to pressure the state legislature to enact policy that promotes accessible and affordable higher education.

Tactics:

  1. Create a coalition with the groups we had worked with in the past and new groups who found this issue pertinent
  2. Hold educational events and create materials with well-researched information on the issue
  3. Build an interactive website
  4. Bring students to a statewide rally organized at the capitol in support of higher education

What Didn’t Work

There was a lack of a group ideology We had brought in a diverse group of people, but outside of those students who worked on previous campaigns, none were really thinking seriously about activist work beyond just participating in it. They didn’t tie education into race and class, into civil rights and corporate irresponsibility. Privatization was a concept most were not familiar with and we didn’t hold the workshops that were needed to convey these ideas.

No work on developing a public ideology We focused on the threat of students having to pay more money instead of tying the lack of funding in education to a lack of priority, inadequate government and institutionalized racism. Most people who attended the rally came out because friends or organizations asked them to do so. Thank goodness we had a huge “coalition”!

Leadership was not diverse Although we had a diverse base of students, the leadership (with few exceptions) were all part of an activist subculture. This proved harmful in many ways, including creating difficulties in mobilizing organizations as well as making it more difficult for students who wanted to take an active role to do so.

Groups in the coalition were not mobilized well Due to inexperience on our part, we were not able to effectively use the resources different organizations brought to the table.

What Worked

The issue was a unifying one and was easy to convey For the first time, we were able to bring a diverse group of students together in the form of a coalition because the issue was something that students were able to connect to as something that directly affects them. No one wanted their tuition raised and education cut. SGA became a 1st tier ally.

The ruling party of the student government association was, for the first time, heavily involved in “activist” work with this event. They worked to get the Greek councils mobilized for the rally and helped to add credibility to the coalition. It became almost impossible to marginalize the coalition because of their help.

A good relationship with the administration was formed Students sat down with the University president in order to find ways for students and the administration to work together. The president was on our side! Through this campaign, we began developing a working relationship with the administration — a relationship that would prove extremely beneficial through the course of the campaign.

Support from prominent figures One of the most powerful figures in the state legislature, Sen. Ken Pruitt, led the statewide effort on this campaign. The political force we were able to build on campus would not have had the power it did without Sen. Pruitt’s help.

Successful website and publicity We were able to put together a successful website that included educational materials and a petition for students to sign. We used the website as a way to reach out to those who cared about the issues, but didn’t have much time to participate and take a stand. This way, we were able to obtain over 800 signatures with minimal effort. We also were constantly flyering, chalking, tabling, and petitioning with well put-together documents outlining our findings and reasons why we were doing this.

Successful Student Rally The rally was the last big event the coalition put together. We gained significant media exposure, including the front page of campus papers devoted to it. We had approximately 600 students there, with various campus subcultures represented, including cultural organizations, student unions, student government and every Greek council at the university.

See Also

    • [[How To Run an Event]]
    • [[How To Run A Meeting]]

    Links

    • [[Young People For]]
    • [[http://www.youngpeoplefor.org/pdf/COALITIONBUILDINGLBB.PDF|YPF Little Black Book: Coalition Building]]
    February 1st, 2007 12:07pm
    Tags:
    Syndicate content